Neil Ferguson. Professor Lockdown. His word has been taken as gospel by SAGE, the government, and the British people, and his modelling influenced the decision to introduce lockdown back in March. Let's take a look at some of his other statistical works of art. 2001 - Foot and Mouth Disease! In 2001 Ferguson and his team produced modelling that influenced culling policies, including "ring" culling - slaughtering animals in neighbouring farms despite no evidence of infection (well, they could have been asymptomatic) This move cost the UK economy an estimated £10 billion, plus the wasted slaughter of over 6 million cattle, sheep, and pigs. The modelling used was heavily criticised by experts, who claim the modelling was "severely flawed", "not fit for purpose" and made a "serious error". Clearly, this heroic work deserved an OBE, awarded to Ferguson in 2002. 2002 - Mad Cow Disease! Ferguson predicted up to 50,000 deaths from BSE in the UK...
The following images are screenshots of a few google searches I made. Basing my searches off the auto-fill recommendations, it took me less than 10 minutes to discover that Pfizer has a long history of corruption and harm, including illegally testing unapproved drugs on children. And the longer you spend reading through it all, the more cases you uncover. This information was so quick and easy to find, and yet I'll bet anyone who's taken the Pfizer vaccine hasn't found this out. We all know that Pfizer cannot be sued for any harm their vaccine causes - and that made me curious. Have they been sued before? That one tiny spark of curiosity, a few quick google searches, and BAM. Can open, worms EVERYWHERE. Nigeria have sued Pfizer for causing extensive damage to children with experimental medication that parents did not consent to. Pfizer claimed they obtained "verbal consent" from the parents, but the parents maintain they were not sufficiently informed on the dan...
The horrifying attack in Southport was an alarming uptick in the ongoing rise in violence across the country. The government clearly don't intend to stop it, but we can put pressure on police to improve. Protests are a valid way of demonstrating our frustration but they're being whipped up into violence and we need other options right now. We need to be asking the police to tell us what changes they're going to make to stop it from happening again. I contacted, separately, Essex Police and our Police Fire and Crime Commissioner. The PFCC has responded to my questions as follows: The PFCC "has responsibility for ensuring that [Essex Police] provide an efficient and effective service", according to the website. How does the Commissioner intend to ensure that the "efficient and effective service" includes preventing a similar attack from occurring in Essex? The PFCC holds boards on a monthly basis where he scrutinises the performance of Essex Police. T...
Comments
Post a Comment